🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a newly configured congressional district plan that may create as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to lift a federal judge's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had mandated the state to revert to the districts created after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

This decision comes amid a nationwide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives lamented the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A leading House leader said the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by approving a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.